Skip to main content

About your Search

Search Results 0 to 4 of about 5 (some duplicates have been removed)
that about george w. bush. the whole press would have gone nuts. every once in a while you look at mitt romney and go how did the that guy wind up winning this race? and then you are reminded oh right, he won, because he was running against them. all right. when we come back we're going to do a fun segment. what would we do to mitt romney if we were like fox news? >> if you are running for president, you really can't speak honestly to the american people. in your jeep grand cherokee. and when you do, you'll be grateful for the adaptive cruise control that automatically adjusts your speed when approaching slower traffic. and for the blind spot monitoring that helps remind you that the highway might not be as desolate... you thought. ♪ ♪ double miles you can "actually" use. but with those single mile travel cards... [ bridesmaid ] blacked out... but i'm a bridesmaid. oh! "x" marks the spot she'll never sit. but i bought a dress! a toast... the capital one venture card. fly any airline, any flight, anytime. double m
w. bush administration president obama talked about renewing the ban but dropped it from his agenda and won't talk about renewing it. there is an excellent article on this situation. we have 90 guns per 100 people. compare that to yemen where there are 61 guns for 100 people and americans purchased 4.5 million out of the 8 millionon ns inforordd worldwidedeac year. >> cenk: congratulations to us. we're number one. yemen is number two. if we keep it up, we'll be just like yemen or yemen may be just like us. i don't know which is worse. what is the solution. >> the big solution is campaign finance reform. you cannot continue to allow the national rifle association to write the gun laws. democrats have cowed to them forever. the democratic party needs--there is a big story with the 50-state solution with democrats, and there is a problem of overreputation of rural areas. the real answer is democrats need to have some balls on this issue. they need to come up and say we'll lose north and south carolina, but we need to control guns. >> cenk: i think the point michael is making is incredi
there was no rational basis for justifying it. she was a george w. bush appointee. in fact, five different federal judges have voted against the defense of marriage act and it heads to the supreme court soon based on this track and there's progress all over the map in fact democrats are now thinking of putting it in their party platform and pass unilaterally in the first round. they will determine if it goes in the platform or not. when you look at the whole country, there's gigantic movement. look at this, 57% in 2001. used to oppose gays and lesbians being allowed to marry legally. only 35% were in favor. now it has flipped around. 48% are in favor and 44% are against. so that is just a gigantic amount of movement in a little over a decade. then president obama came out and said he was for gay marriage. that moved some democrats as well. since he has said that, well, the country is on a similar path here as you can see. it has gone from 47% to 38%. it has gone up a tiny bit. we don't know if that's statistically signif
Search Results 0 to 4 of about 5 (some duplicates have been removed)